In the case of XMBQ and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration) [2021] AATA 853 (13 April 2021), XMBQ’s permanent refugee (subclass 200) visa was cancelled mandatorily whilst he was serving a sentence for a sexually based offence involving a child. These are one of the most serious crimes but the Tribunal set aside the decision and substituted it with a decision to revoke the visa cancellation.

Facts
He obtained his permanent visa in 2003. His criminal records ranged from 2010-2017 resulting in various terms of imprisonments involving violent and sexual conduct. His criminal conducts included being drunk in a public place, possession of drug, serious violence offences against police offers and emergency workers, breach of bail conditions, contravention of suspended sentence orders. Most recently, his sexually based offence involving a child involved two occasions of him going in front of 2 females and masturbating in front of them.
On 15 December 2017, XMBQ’s subclass 200 permanent visa was cancelled whilst he was serving a term of imprisonment for the conviction of a sexually based offence involving a child.
On first instance, the Tribunal had actually affirmed the decision to cancel his visa in April 2019 for the sexually based offences against a child and serving a term of imprisonment. XMBQ had successfully appealed this to the Federal Court of Australia where there was a direction for the Tribunal to reconsider the decision as it had failed to give meaningful consideration to the risk of harm to the applicant in Somalia when considering whether there is ‘another reason’ the decision should be revoked. This followed the decision of Minister for Home Affairs v Omar.
Tribunal’s Findings when remitted
The crimes of sexual and violent nature are viewed very seriously and his offending had a cumulative effect which were relatively frequent. The Tribunal accepted a forensic psychiatrist’s evidence that there was a moderate risk of offending which could be reduced to low if appropriate intervention and support was provided to XMBQ.
Surprisingly, in considering what would be the expectations of the Australian community, the Tribunal found that the Australian community would afford a higher level of tolerance with respect to his past criminal behaviour and be willing to provide community and support services because he had arrived in Australia as a refugee at the age of 36 years and had acquired brain injury and trauma issues which he was not equipped to properly address at the time.
The Tribunal then placed emphasis on the consideration of the harm he would suffer if returned to his home country (which was separate to a consideration of Australia’s non-refoulement obligations). The risk XMBQ would suffer could be summarised as follows:
- There is still the Islamic terrorist group, Al Shabaab, which continues to operate in Somalia.
- As a Christian convert with mental illness and no clan affiliations or personal connections in Somalia, he presented a high risk of harm if he returned to Somalia.
- It is accepted that Australia owes XMBQ a non-refoulement obligation.
- If the visa cancellation were not revoked, then the legal consequence would be to remove him from Australia. The Tribunal takes into account that he would remain in detention whilst options were considered in light of the non-refoulement obligations and that it would seem inconsistent for the Minister to exercise any discretion in granting a further protection visa to him if he had earlier decided to cancel his visa. Therefore, it was concluded that the applicant had a real risk of suffering significant harm if the cancellation was not revoked.
In weighing all of these factors, the Tribunal placed heavy weight on the risk of harm he would suffer and Australia’s non-refoulement obligations which had outweighed al of the other considerations which were against the revocation.
XMBQ was therefore given a visa back despite his sexually based offence against a child, and other violent and sexual crimes.
You may wish to find out more on our page relating to visa cancellation and refusals.
Otherwise, if your visa has been cancelled, please email us immediately on [email protected].
Was this article helpful?
Need to consult with us? Book an appointment today.
Our team will give you expert advice that has been specifically tailored to your case.
Successful Cases

Domestic Violence: Passed character requirements/VACCU
08/31/2023
Schedule 3 requirement and family violence in partner visa
06/22/2023
Overstayed visa for 1.5 years
11/25/2022
Visa cancelled: Successful appeal to AAT
07/12/2022Related news

Dreaming of Australia? How to Migrate to Australia Based on Your Life Stage

Australian Visitor Visa Refusals Surge: What Travellers Need To Know

National Innovation Visa: NSW Sets the Bar for World-Class Talent
How we will help
Free Assessment
Please call us or fill in the questionnaire here for a free initial assessment. After a simple communication, we will understand your concerns and visa requirements in detail, and then provide a timely and comprehensive professional consultation with tailor-made plans.
Consultation
Our consultations are typically 45-60 minutes long, which allows us to provide you with a detailed strategy to address the needs and concerns you raised with us during the initial call.
Our fee is $400 + GST for the full session. You can book in a consultation by calling us, emailing us or filling in the Contact Us form.
Developing and Managing a Strategy
During our consultation session, we will go through in more detail your background and circumstances to ensure that we can provide a tailored solution to your problems and making sure that you meet all the legal requirements. If we notice any potential issues, we will also immediately formulate a solution.
We’ll also balance time required, cost and difficulty and allow you choose the most appropriate strategy. We will then attend to all visa application matters on your behalf.